Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck
Obviously the value is there in a 1-for-1. The point is using your limited trade assets to secure more pressing needs now and into the future, not another winger at their near peak salary cost.
Sample size of everyone thinks Robertson is a more valuable piece than Andersson. But making that move and signing Robertson to a long term deal isn’t a direction I’m hoping to see from the Flames.
|
Why? How is he not a pressing need? He’d also be RFA at the end of his deal.