Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck
Like McTavish, think he’s a great fit for the Flames situation, but our ‘26 pick still should not be on the table.
|
Flames will have to be confident they're not a Lottery team with McTavish in the fold if they move the 26 1st. Which is plausible.
McTavish is in the group of players I'd personally be okay gambling the 26 flames 1st on. The nay sayers will have their objections but really, all you're looking for is productive games played by a player on your team. McTavish will be a player for the Flames for a very long time. And is more likely to be that than the unknown player they may get to draft.
I don't know. Seems pretty far afield to see McTavish moved. But I'm game to see the Flames make a splash. What does an aggressive Conroy trade look like.