There's a world of difference in saying "We don’t even have a top 10 ranked farm system according to most publications" v. you saying "I think they are ranked in the 10-12 range". If you don't see that I can't help you. One is clearly framing things as a negative statement about the prospects relative to how you perceive fan expectations. The other is just stating where you think they rank.
If you had something like "I think they are ranked in the 10-12 range" my response would have been much more different and something like "I think they could be a bit higher like 7-9".
And then you called me delusional when i hadn't even stated where i think they rank. I don't know how someone can be delusional by simply asking what publications you were citing. But here we are.
|