Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86
Lol.
You know, I was wondering if some stupid #### like this was going to come up as this argument was occurring. I was pleasantly surprised and quite happy it didn't. So of course someone had to say something stupid as it was dying down and everyone was sort of coming to terms with the fact no opinions were changing.
Go read the thread about the trade, dweeb.
|
I was hoping someone would bring it up earlier, I've actually been waiting for someone to respond by bringing up the Kane thing - because it highlights one of the most important aspects about this discussion IMO.
I can't recall exactly how your reaction was in the Kane thread, but I remember you being less than thrilled to say the least (I don't have the time and energy to go into an old thread and do detective work).
But the thing is, one can still be critical of the morality of another clubs actions while also acknowledging the actions of your own club that you're unhappy about - they aren't mutually exclusive.
The posters who are ok with this hire and believe he's learned from his mistakes, we didn't fully know his role etc. you're completely entitled to your opinion, but my question would be - if the Oilers hired Seabrook would you have the same rhetoric? Or would you use his past to throw pot shots at the Oilers? If the answer is the latter that's where I have a problem. Not accusing anyone in the thread of this btw.