Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Not sure a reply to 40 different people is the proof that you're not going overboard that you think it is.
|
I'm sorry you feel that I'm going overboard. Personally, I think I've been quite restrained, but have zero issue with "going overboard" on this issue. Some issues are worth being loud about. This is one of them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
You pointed out things that I haven't done, so I'm not uncomfortable at all. I had a similar view to Seravelli's Gaudreau tweet last year when he got run over as well. It isn't a Flame thing for me.
|
You were downplaying Seabrook's role and actions saying we needed more information while jokingly bragging about not reading the information available. That's a big thing I've been banging on about here. People acting like we don't know what happened. Comparing a ####ty tweet to knowing and staying quiet about a sexual assault are just not in the same realm.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
To me there is a difference between knowing something and not coming forward (I'd likely come forward so I'm not saying it's ok) and being part of the group ridiculing the victim.
If Seabrook is part of the latter group ... like say JT Miller was in Vancouver with Pettersson than he's garbage.
|
I agree, there is a difference but I don't think Seabrook should get a pass even if it's the former. I'd be a hell of a lot less diplomatic (as we know I've been in the past) if it was the latter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
The poster who brought this up in here seems to be full on raging about it.
|
I prefer "Full throatedly calling out" as opposed to raging, but am not necessarily against raging if we get there.