Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978
Lots were saying he wasn't anything in his time in Edmonton. He sure looked good once he was in St Louis. I bet his numbers suggested the same thing as Kane's did.
Kane lost all his top ice to Hyman, he's not over paid and he isn't terrible. He was one of their better depth players and losing him for nothing isn't a straight addition to their team. They still need to find a way to use that cap for cheap replacement to improve.
|
Holloway's numbers did not say the same thing.
The numbers showed Holloway, who was on his way up, was better than Kane at that point in time, AND Kane was on his way down.