Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
This is exactly my point though, I feel like we're constantly given a "good enough" approach, but if you keep just stacking "good enough" fixes/ strategy adjustments, it's unlikely to add to a sum of "good enough."
If I'm managing a long term project, and I have 75/100 of my decisions go against the grain of original intention, I am probably starting to sweat that I'm going to miss my key deliverables, whether in timeline or substance.
I still fail to see how the current "strategy" on roster building will have this team being a competitor in the 27 season (building open, theoretically).
|
I think you only see no strategy or "good enough" if you feel there is only one decision on every single asset, which all have to lead to the burn it to the ground scenario.