Quote:
Originally Posted by FanSince'01
I brought this up in the Raz thread, and I’m not criticizing your thought process, but I think adding 18th OA to 4th would be a sizable overpay already to get to #2. I know trading up to the top of the draft usually requires overpay but this year there isn’t much difference between #2 and #4.
So, me personally, I’d want something back if we were hypothetically trading #18 along with #4. Say #30 or #33. Definitely wouldn’t add anything on top, at the very least.
|
Depends on a number of things.
Many think their is a sizable ledge at #2, so the difference between 2 and 3 may be big.