Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
I think Calgary would agree from what I’ve heard.
Just not sure they have or want to give what it would take.
Next years first would have to be included
|
I can't believe I'm saying this, but to get #2 overall, is putting the '26 first on the table out of the question?
If we don't think the Flames are top 5 pick bad next year, then it's a good gamble.
And if you're SJ, you don't have to squint too hard to see the Flames could very likely be lottery pick bound.