Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly
Yeah, I see where you're coming from. It just seems that the Flames are in a great position to attempt turning multiple assets, into 1 quality asset, which doesn't have to be Rossi. I also don't think that lossing Honzek would be a huge loss for the organization thanks to the depth the Flames have accumulated, similar to when we traded Pelts.
PS: If the intention is a slow rebuild, and keeping all future assets, I support that as well, it just didn't quite sound like it was the intention at the year end interviews.
|
Do these really happen any more? Every time a team trades a great player for multiple assets, it turns out badly.