Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
And I largely think you're right on all points, what sticks in my head though is MBates' characterization of consent and the inconsistency of events.
So I think you're right that they wanted to go with a Judge to try and remove emotion from the scenario.
I dunno man, as you said, 'armchair Juror' but I have a feeling that some of these guys are going to walk.
My instinct is that what they did was gross, does it constitute a crime? Like I said, I'm no lawyer nor do I play one on TV and they never covered this on Matlock.
|
If you're talking about what the lawyers were alleged to have done, I'm pretty certain the Law Society of Ontario will have something to say or study once the trial is done. Questions should be asked. Censure may occur. Or...not.