View Single Post
Old 06-05-2025, 11:44 AM   #994
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
I find it strange that some people believe there has been some big change with new management.

We still tried to overpay an overrated Lindholm long term. We still tried to overpay an overrated Hanifin long term. We tried to re sign Tanev. Just because we got lucky and everyone said no to us, does not mean we have some new and fresh vision for the team.

I've also heard both Dreger and Seravelli saying the Flames are going to be big game hunting in free agency. That shows how out to lunch our ownership still is on how to build a contender.

So we are now holding management responsible for doing things they didn’t do?

These are all good players. If the mutual was there, something may have happened. There was definitely a factor of what had happened with the team which was considered. I am sure the Flames made reasonable offers, but had their limits as to how far they would go. At the end of the day, they were traded, not walked to free agency. And the returns were not too shabby

Quite honestly, competently managing the hand you are dealt, and having discipline around asset management, and decent drafting - there is a freshness there if you want to see it
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post: