Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff
Which is stupid, its basically having lost in court, them ruling illegal what you are doing but then this appeals court saying 'nah, keep doing illegal while your appeal goes up'.
|
Which is how we want courts to be. We want the ruling paused in the direction that does the least harm.
Like with Roe v Wade some small court in Alabama shouldn’t be able to stop abortions nation wide.
So that’s why there is the initial ruling invalidating laws and then the apeal and then the fight over whether or not the law stays in place during the appeal and the fight whether the law stays in place while the decision on whether the law should stay in place during the appeal is made.