View Single Post
Old 05-30-2025, 10:12 AM   #47
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
https://www.florugby.com/articles/67...more-dangerous


Uh, they are both really bad. Particularly for concussions.
Most things worth doing have risk.

30+ yrs of playing and I only have minor CTE


Quote:
The data would suggest that rugby is indeed a more dangerous sport in the sense that a player is more likely to get hurt while playing. However, the severity of injury is likely higher in football, considering the nature of the collisions to be at a greater speed and with less control.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy View Post
Wait, you are serious?

High school rugby was my son's best sports experience by far, but it seemed like there was a concussion every other game. His only concussion came in Rugby, after having played hockey for 10 years.

Community hockey was the worst experience, but Quadrant was a positive experience overall, other than a disappointing draft in the final year of Midget.

He did one year of rowing at University, but it was a huge time commitment and the cardio was cutting into his gainz.

He is all about the gym now, and has met most of his friends at Uni that way.
Much if the injuries in High School come from poor coaching and frankly playing surfaces. Numerous high school fields are hard as rock and poorly maintained.

We have had zero head injuries this season. Proper coaching and technique greatly reduce the instances of concussion.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote