Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
The accuser's memory was the same way. Could remember potentially incriminating details easily, but other details couldn't be recalled because she was too out of it (like the "consent" video for example that happened hours after they left the bar).
Both sides have legal representation and 7 years of coaching to get here. I suspect the judge is used to this kind of thing and isn't being fooled.
|
People's memories are typically poor. Many years after the fact people will have formulated a story in their mind, they now believe to be true. Having focused on (and potentially fabricated) certain details and forgotten others. That's pretty typical.