[troutman]

Originally Posted by Titan2

This is a serious question. As our resident cynic, how do publications like the Narwhal stand up for truthiness? Are they considered factual and reliable? It seems like the inherent bias would be off the charts but I may just be swilling the O/G propaganda.

What are considered the best 'environmental' sources to learn more about this stuff?

The term is skeptic, not cynic.

https://elkriveralliance.ca/selenium/

https://e360.yale.edu/features/from-...ows-no-borders

https://wildsight.ca/2024/08/15/cont...ium-pollution/

https://www.groundwatercanada.com/a-...s-groundwater/

https://www.usgs.gov/news/toxic-mine...a-fish-species

https://elkvalleycoal.com/teck-baffl...fish-collapse/

https://www.teck.com/media/2014-Wate...T3.2.3.2.1.pdf

https://fernie.com/blog/new-reports-...tion-problems/

https://www.thefreepress.ca/news/dea...-river-5086294

https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/do...67/1.0042380/1