Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
I get what you're saying, but comparing both MacKinnon and Makar to Barzal and Marner is far from equal, so your point is lost a bit.
I'd avoid paying for both Barzal and Marner personally myself, but I'd take either MacKinnon or Makar in a heart beat as both players are undeniably better in all aspects and would change our franchise instantly. But that's because both players are impact players on their own. Where as I view both Marner and Barzal as complimentary pieces and not franchise players.
|
I find that you present perfectly legit reasons why you would disagree with something. There are posters here who don't present valid reasons or at least they won't expand on their reasons. Some just feign disgust that a player was suggested and make a hard pass. Sometimes they pick out one little reason that probably doesn't make sense when compared to the pros and harp on that reason.
I also wasn't meaning to compare MacKinnon and Makar to Barzal and Marner, I was trying to use them as an extreme example. There are people on this site who would find a way to hate on the Flames getting a player who would push the needle.
Most days I read and scroll along. I must be tired today because I read and became triggered at that one comment in general. Not because enoch did or didn't have valid point but just because at that moment in time I felt the need to speak up against some of the negative approaches I see.