Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
I disagree. Dillon was captain of this team, right? I think it's pretty natural that he be the one to start/ lead conversations and don't think you can attribute any guilt because of that. Further, again, I don't think it's out of the ordinary for a group who is in a crisis situation to wish to discuss the crisis situation. The fact that the group chat exists doesnt demonstrate any guilt on whether or not there was consent at any point.
The contents of the chat so far don't seem to be very predatory. If anything, it seems at the time that the group felt they would be easily vindicated by details of the story. Repeated requests to tell the truth... that doesnt really read like trying to fix a story. They're not repeating specific details of events to each other in the chat. There are some loose details. I'm not privy to all details of the case, but I don't think that's smoking gun evidence of anything.
I also don't think a desire to use different messaging software can really be taken as evidence of guilt. Though, I agree, the use of snapchat in particular is typical of wanting to hide or delete conversations. But it's not a 1+1=2 situation.
|
Are we reading the same texts? Why do you need a massive group text to make sure everyone gets their story straight, and Dube telling someone not to say what he did. Also discussing using different messaging apps that we both agree that messages disappear. Why do you think people send nudes through snapchat, sure it can be screen captures but the person can see that it has been.
Or messages of but we took a video having her say she consented to this all. Why would you need that unless you didn't feel like you did something wrong.
Not sure him being the captain has anything to do with it, unless he felt something wrong was done and they all needed to say the same thing.