Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor
The defense seems to be employing a strategy to discredit the victim's account by portraying her as unreliable. They're presenting multiple narratives to try and throw doubt any way things are framed.
If she was intoxicated, they suggest she has a "drunk fun" persona, and she was into it at the time but regrets her actions sober.
If she was sober, they claim she was fully coherent, complicit and unrealiable as she can't remember now even thiugh she was sober.
As they attack her creditibility they're also turning into a she said/they said situation to cause reasonable doubt. Saying she was asking them to do stuff and wanted to be the center of attention.
|
Ya the defense does work for the defendents. Nothing surprising or unusual here.