Quote:
Originally Posted by Titan2
This is annoying. Everything said and submitted in court is evidence. It is for the trier of fact to determine how convincing each piece of evidence is, or is not, based on a myriad of factors. The term people should be using is 'proof', and even then, it is only proof to YOU. Clearly, there has not been enough evidence called to prove anything. At the end of both cases, the trier of fact will consider ALL of the evidence presented and determine whether or not the Crown has proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
Shut up! I've watched enough courtroom dramas in movies and TV to know what I am talking about. You just CAN'T HANDLE THE TOOTH!