Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
As already discussed, that’s not how consent works. That’s why there is a trial despite that video having existed and part of every investigation for years.
|
Except it is. There is video evidence consent was given. That is submitted into evidence. You can debate if she was too intoxicated for it to matter but it is evidence none the less. You are letting your personal feelings about this get in the way. The defence has presented evidence that there was consent. What has the crown shown that there wasn't? The burden of proof is in the prosecution, they have not proven anything yet.