Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Thanks, I am capable and interested, but I can’t see it, which is why I asked. I wouldn’t have asked if I could have.
I’m guessing the non-response means I’m correct in not seeing anything misleading or inaccurate (not including the name typo, obviously).
|
Just because it's not technically inaccurate, it's extremely slanted and tries to take a multifaceted discussion and dumb it down to a question that is presented in such a simple manner as to elicit one response, anger.
The question basically says, do you support taking tax payer money and giving all.proceeds to billionaires. No logical person says yes to that. But that is such an insultingly dumb attempt to break down the arena discussion it should be derided as such, especially as the question serves no purpose than to rile up potential voters.
Stop the divisive nature of politics. Don't spend time bemoaning a deal that is already done as a means to garner support. Try spending time discussing what you will do in the future to better the City. Simple.