Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
Lol concerned that someone is entering your well established turf?
The large scale societal problem is jumping to conclusions based on scant evidence. Not some sort of guilt and innocence grey area mumbo jumbo. This problem isn't only applicable to court cases, though it seems to be especially prevalent there. I think another good example was reddit lynching the wrong person for the boston bombing. Or covid misinformation- like lab leak theory.
|
Like accusing someone of having already made up their mind that the accused are guilty because they point out that not guilty =/= innocent, right?
Save the jabs, you’ll embarrass yourself further. It really seems like you’re making stuff up because you’re desperate to share some sweeping commentary on the ills of society you thought up late at night. So far we’re covered Trump, innocent people sentenced to death, COVID, the Boston bombing… any other ground you feel the need to cover or do you think it’s possible to refocus and try to make a point without strawman and extreme examples?
If you’re living in a world where no conclusions can be made and thinking this trial is about landing on either side of some binary reality where this all happened with malicious intent or it was all made up, then you’re not living in reality.
You’re aware that it is entirely possible and entirely likely (based on how difficult these specific kinds of trials are especially) that all of this happened, everything the victim says from her feelings to her actions and the actions of others is absolutely true, and yet there are “not guilty” verdicts across the board, right?