Honestly, I struggle with the concept of reasonable doubt and separating belief from certainty. It's not good enough to believe they are guilty, but you need to be certain.
When you have no stake in the final decision, it's easy to bury defendants because you believe they likely did it, but if there is any evidence favourable to the defendants, a small but reasonable doubt can linger. It's especially tough in these kinds of cases where a lot of the evidence is less tangible than say one where there is forensics.
Still lots of evidence to be presented in this case and I am sure there'll be some expert testimony which should help.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|