Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
I understand the angle, as rare as false accusations are, if one was to make a false accusation it could be in a case of cheating and you wanted to remove responsibility from yourself if your partner finds out. I personally know of a situation like that, however in that case, the police couldn't find enough evidence and the accuser eventually came clean.
In this this case though, the idea seems absurd. First, because by the sounds of it, her boyfriend didn't know and may never have found out. But also, who would go into the details she did for a simple false accusation? The spitting, slapping, golf club, a player doing the splits on her.... all that stuff seems too oddly specific if someone was trying to concoct a story on the fly. Why add all the humiliation factors? It wouldn't make sense.
|
All of the details of the acts were outlined in the statement of fact and were not contested by the defence. All that stuff happened. (Edit: I may have spoken out of turn. I thought that is how they had the names tied to each specific act, but I can’t find the info I thought I read to share)
I understand that the only thing that is being argued is if she wanted all of that to happen or not. It all happened.