Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
The "if they were your daughter" is the wrong standard.
There is nothing legally wrong with the acts themselves, as long as all parties involved were consenting. I think that's the point. People get into all sorts of freaky stuff that others don't understand and certainly wouldn't want to hear their daughters partaking in.
But that's not the issue.
The issue is simply of consent and whether it was provided.
|
Yes - that is the legal standard. There are a lot of legal standards for which the bar is FAR lower than what we might call a "human standard".
There is no legal standard for being nasty to people on a forum (like CP eg) but there IS a human standard...and eventually Mods get fed up with people who are unpleasant...and ban them. MMF and Moon would probably have comments here. THAT is the human standard being applied.
There is a difference. A group of young men "playing" with a lone female....I'm not sure that meets a human standard for anyone (including if she were your daughter). Why? Because the exact thing that appears to have occurred COULD occur as a result...and especially when drunk, consent is dubious. Given that she went to the Police the next day is telling.
Personally I don't care what people do, if consenting and actually ABLE TO PROVIDE CLEAR CONSENT. Drunk...? Hmmm. Lower resistance operational.
This will be an interesting test in jurisprudence.