Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
I want to go back to the Andersson injury talk.
Why are we continuing to let players play through obviously detrimental injuries? Did our franchise learn absolutely nothing from the Monahan situation? If Andersson was hurt he should have been off the ice. Let players heal don't play them through injuries.
|
A broken foot is an injury that you hear players play through all the time. Because it doesn't make the injury worse and it can be gutted out.
The question then is - is a replacement better than Anderson at, for argument sake, 80% effectiveness. None of the roster D fit that descirption. No doubt you say Parekh would be but there's no evidence to support that because there's no body of NHL work.