Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathgod
Sure did. You didn't take the L and move on the other day so here we are.
Because having the ability to go 3-0-1 and get to 96 points (and having a shot at 97) vs needing to go 4-0-0 to get to 96 points... literally does change the math. Changes it in a pretty dramatic way.
It's kind of like being down 2-0 in a playoff series, on track to win game 3 but then losing it in heartbreaking fashion... and being like DON'T WORRY, THIS DOESN'T CHANGE THE MATH MUCH. WE NEEDED TO WIN 4 IN A ROW ANYWAY
And then lose the series in 4 or 5 and be like, see, I was right!! Our odds were bad either way!
Come on dino, can't you admit that the loss to Anaheim was costly? If you want to say I'm wrong about Wolf or some other stuff, fine, I can accept it. But don't say I'm wrong about this. The Flames could be in control of their destiny, but instead need a result from the Ducks or Golf Club to have a chance.
|
Omg you are still on this...I said it didnt change the math much because the math was already steep.
The lost point matters IF they tie in the end. Like any other lost point this season. For a "mathgod" you arent good at math. Its unlikely the Anaheim game is the difference because its unlikely they tie.
If they tie in the end yes that will be one of the lost points they look back on.