Quote:
Originally Posted by Titan2
Not attacking you, Lubicon, but I find this stance gobsmacking.
It is just like the US election. It is realistically down to a decision between two people. One has a Phd, a Master's and an Ivy League degree in economics. Internationally renowned for his intellect. The other thinks the freedom truckers are the way to go. This should not be a vote between party history or stated positions, but the one with the best man for the job. In our system, a majority holding PM can fashion the country as he sees fit. Which of these guys would anyone want at the drafting table?
To me, it seems like a pretty clear choice.
|
It’s wild to me that in Britain they were the original OGs of electing totally unqualified grifters (who became trump lovers - surprise) and voted for Brexit. Now the economy is ruined and they’re out of money and talking about austerity again.
Then in the usa they elected totally unqualified grifters for a second time and have what looks to be a self-caused Great Depressio and the fastest fall of an empire that is possible without a massive loss in war.
And now voters in Canada look at trump fanboys here in Alberta and nationally and think ‘I want some of that.’
Do you like what happened in the UK and what’s happening in the USA? Because that is what you’d be voting for with PP.
It’s so sad to me to see so many people so easily led to support politigans and policy that is so obviously bad.
Fundamentalh PP is completely unqualified for this role.