Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I think booting candidates as things arise is positive. It’s a negative that there isn’t better vetting but it shows they know that they need to appeal to the general public to obtain power. So to be having 1% of candidates get through the vetting process and being forced to resign isn’t unreasonable.
|
It reveals a lot about the nomination process and the people making the nominations in area ridings.
Generally, those people are the weirdest ones, politically