Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
This appears to be done by the same group who did regular vote compass. Which questions did you take issue with?
It might be old though as the spectrum of the parties looks different than regular vote compass.
|
It appears to be done by a different group in Ontario called CIVIX, I don't know much about, using the same votecompass platform
Specifically I made it 6 questions in, 3 were very leading IMO. They are weighted to sound more reasonable in 1 direction than the other, especially when it seems
"White people have unfair advantages in Canada."
I don't think this needs explanation, a lot of lefties got over zealous with their rhetoric for years, and these questions are meant to spur a reactionary response in a plurality of the population. No Party is making this a topic of the election
"The government should hire qualified job applicants from historically marginalized groups even in cases where there are other applicants who may be more qualified."
This an imagined problem of the right, there is little evidence of it happening (except for when Trump fired all of the Black people so he could hire guys who hosted weekend morning talk shows, or that scraped roadkill up for dinner. In Trumps own words White people are being marginalized. So he started making affirmative action hires). No Party is making this a topic of the election
"Environmental regulations should be stricter, even if it means everyone has to pay more for the goods and services they consume.:
The Carbon tax regime was not a plan to pay more, the vast majority of people were made whole, and it was a plan to influence people into spending less money over time, this is an inaccurate reflection of the policy to make people knee jerk against paying more.