I have a hard time believing that even if someone signed a waiver and got hurt on the ride, they still wouldn't seek money. I can almost guarantee that if they got hurt they wouldn't pay for it out of there own pocket. But I wouldn't expect them to pay for it anyways, but I would expect them to avoid such a situation in the first place.
What I don't understand is, why, Sikhs would want to put themselves in harm in the first place. I would guess your chances of getting hurt on bumper cars is pretty low, but why risk it? Is going on bumper cars that important to you that it is worth the risk of scrambling your brains? Same with a motorcycle. The risk of sustaining a serious injury is pretty high if you crash a bike. Take that helmet off and I am sure the fatality rate is through the roof. And CC if they are dumb enough to actually not what to wear a helmet in combat, I'd say let them because obliviously they don't have anything to protect anyways. I'm kidding of course, actually I wouldn't want someone that wouldn't wear a helmet in the military, they would probably just be a liability to everyone in their squad anyways.
I don't like how religious beliefs/practises trump all. There is no way someone would be able to challenge this helmet rule if it wasn't backed by religion. But for whatever reason religion is put above all safety, reason, and logic to accommodate.
|