View Single Post
Old 03-21-2025, 12:12 PM   #22468
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Maybe he won't go with the caps despite what his Minister said the other day. I'm starting to get the feeling that he is telling his team and Cabinet one thing while telling the public something else.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmon...ting-1.7489042
I think it’s as simple as knowing that a progressively increasing carbon tax is functionally the same as a cap on emissions because CSS becomes economic at a certain Carbon price. It’s semantics to make people feel better but I’d still argue the correct path because eventually the world gets its head out of its ass and we will be well positioned to compete to supply the last barrels.

And provided the government (ie the public) chooses to reduce its revenue from Carbon Captured barrels it can be accommodated.

Last edited by GGG; 03-21-2025 at 12:17 PM.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote