View Single Post
Old 03-20-2025, 02:44 PM   #22371
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2ArmBands View Post
This is taken right from the article. Is this the production highs you are referring to?

The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers — which represents companies responsible for three-quarters of Canada’s annual oil and natural gas production — said the proposed changes would deter investment and undermine employment in the sector.

This week, a group of top energy executives called on the leaders of the four main federal political parties to declare a Canadian energy crisis and scrap the emissions cap.
The production highs were suggested by the PBO report, which I mentioned. Hell, if you wanted to be smart, you could have just read the report and seen that the PBO suggested O&G companies would likely just cut production to meet the emissions cap, which I then would have pointed out as a cut to the 15+% increase which is still an increase, and then we could have gone around in circles a couple times.

Weirdly, I still don’t see anywhere in your quote why you lied about it being a “production cap.” When you have to lie to make someone look bad (especially for something with plenty of valid criticism like an emissions cap), it makes you look pretty silly.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote