Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
The thing is, you don’t find out the values. Like all you’re going to find out is that he has Brookfield Shares or RSUs (for example), and there are no values. We know the assets that Poilievre has (some ETFs including a Bitcoin ETF and some rental property), but that’s all you find out. So really, it’s just much ado about nothing.
|
Why isn't he disclosing them when he is going to need to anyways and they are supposedly much ado about nothing, resorting to "following the rules" rhetoric he fully well knows is unique to his situation only?
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/poli...n-blind-trust/
Considering the momentum the Liberals and Carney currently have, stuff like this are unneeded. Poilievre may be desperately trying to stick dirt in a poor strategic move, but if enough dirt does stick because of how Carney responds, it may hurt the Liberals enough to swing the momentum pendulum away from them.