View Single Post
Old 03-07-2025, 09:56 AM   #23910
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrButtons View Post
Listened to a podcast yesterday and the guests (two were from YYC) were talking about how a pipeline across the provinces is probably not likely. it's a decade out if it happens and we should focus on either a smaller goal of getting it to the west coast or instead of pipeline, using rail. I know little to nothing on the rail subject, anyone got any insight on the history of that or the likelihood it could work? Or articles from the bootlickin MSM I could read?

We already move a lot of oil by rail, so that works. The rail lines are already built, so it's just a matter of capacity. It won't be anywhere near as efficient as a pipeline, and can create cost increases in shipping goods elsewhere if the rail companies prioritize oil-by-rail.

They're also right that a 1,000km pipeline to the West Coast, even through the mountains, will be quicker and far less expensive than building a 4,000km pipeline to the East Coast, a lot of that through the Canadian Shield. Energy East's business case was only feasible for TC because they were planning on converting a natural gas pipeline through Ontario to an oil one.

So in the short term, if a federal government wanted to force a pipeline through for national interest reasons at a time when there would be the public will to do so, the Northern Gateway route to the West Coast would be the way to do it.
Roughneck is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roughneck For This Useful Post: