Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan Coke
Or, how about no older player and more assets?
Im fine with an Andersson trade if they get a good return, but there is still no reason to spend those assets at this point.
|
I think the argument is the only way they trade Andersson for a haul of futures, is if they replace him on the team with a cheaper version that costs less assets.
I'm operating under the idea that the only way this Carlo deal happens is if Andersson is gone.
But additionally the only way that Andersson is gone, is if they do another deal (or same deal), that brings in a replacement.