Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon Bombay
Is there a reason Pachal is being mentioned in these trade proposals as a fairly substantial piece? In my opinion he has no trade value. Might be worth a 5th or 6th round pick at deadline.
|
Of course he has value, there's a reason he's the only guy in the bottom 4 whose played every game and hasn't rotated out like the others. Is he the main part of a bigger trade? No. But he's steady, an ideal bottom pairing guy, whose a right shot and has size whose signed to a good contract for the next 2 years. Treliving paid a 4th for Fantenberg, Forbort, a 3rd for Gustavson at the deadline. I'd rather have Pachal than any of those guys.