Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff
My point is, they signed him based on short term success, just like we saw the Flames do with Turek.
|
That I agree with. I just don't think it's anywhere near as potentially damaging as the Turek contract was.
Quote:
|
Sorry I don't meet any of your standards. Thanks for pointing out my stupidity.
|
I do apologize for making it seem that I was accusing you of stupidity. That was never my intention. You're a very good and intelligent poster going all the way back to Usenet days.
I just don't think the Turek comparison is a good fit for what's happening with Lankinen. Please don't take it personally.