Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Not at all. I don’t think there’s a situation out there without quirks and I think there’s upsides and drawbacks to anything (I go into the office sometimes just because I feel like it, it’s not without personal value).
I just think any company that has issues with WFH has issues that were being masked by in-office, not issues specifically related to WFH, because it allows management to be worse and processes to be less effective.
If someone isn’t pulling their weight it really doesn’t matter where they’re working.
|
Isn’t that saying than in office work is more effective because the quality of your processes can be worse, the quality of your management can be worse and your quality of employee can be worse and something about in office work masks all these flaws allowing stuff to still get done.
Like if you can have worse managers by working in the office then that’s a feature of WIO and a challenge in WFM.
Most employees fall in the 5-7 range and you can’t just PIP them all and get rid of them. Most managers are poor at managing ok employees.