Also, while Smith claims she wasn't aware until she read it in the newspaper, she also says Lagrange had been investigating or waiting for proof for 8 months.
Which one is it? And you can't seriously expect us to believe puppet Lagrange wouldn't have told Smith before firing the board and CEO.
Also the little tricky fact that the Auditor General says that they notified the Premier's office before the G&M article came out that they were going to be kicking off an investigation. So if she's lying about when she became aware, what else is she lying about?
The level of corruption and interference that is alleged here is staggering and Smith is clearly not being truthful. This needs a full on public inquiry and (won't happen) resignations. We deserve to know what is going on here and how our public dollars are being spent (wasted). We can't have Daniel Smith directing an investigation into her own office's actions.
Last edited by Torture; 02-13-2025 at 10:30 AM.
|