Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch
I hadn’t seen this argument before. My impression was that Energy East was overloaded with regulations, but this article suggests (internal) competition with Keystone XL was the main driver for cancellation. Any comments from those in the know?
https://www.ualberta.ca/en/folio/201...-pipeline.html |
It was never gonna be both in my opinion and Energy East was largely a stalking horse to achieve what it did, get XL approved. Energy East was not a great project.