Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
OK, I’ll re-quote it and remove the offensive comment that Matt refers to and bold the interesting things. Let me know if you want me to read it to you also or explain the big words.
|
What do you find interesting? His hand waving in the air ranting about not putting Canada first? Or that "my poor mother has to get a security clearance to do food programs at the school."? Sounds like he just ranting about Poilievre and security clearance, something that Singh's predecessor, Tom Mulcair did not have as opposition leader when he was and fully agrees with Poilievre
Need to clarify here and explain the big words you want to focus on.
Quote:
To explain one thing for you, Angus did not “deflect” on the word traitor, he’s referring to the fact that the focus is on there not being any “traitors” which is the wrong thing to focus on in his opinion, something JK touches on as well:
Perhaps it would be better if you actually read it and didn’t just hyperfocus on the specific mention of Trudeau. That way you could understand the entire flow of the segment and what was being discussed instead of making comments about people “spooging” and patting yourself on the back for googling readily available things.
|
You literally quoted part of what I quoted. Michel Juneau-Katsuya says more investigation is needed to meet the legal threshold. But he fully believes they are traitors and that the report only sees it from a judge perspective. Not sure how that is hard for you to grasp. Instead you are quoting Angus talking about his mother.