Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee
Bingo. Also in BC, because development requires BC gov and they’re idiots, it’s started to slide into approval not consultation.
People here wouldn’t believe what industry is dealing with right now in NEBC. Total gong show and has blown the doors off the arguments being made in this thread.
Where’s the future of Montney development in Canada? Moreso in Alberta or BC? And we have a band of 200 people up there causing a mass clusterF of epic proportions and then people in this thread scrambling all over themselves to argue our way into why that’s right and justified and makes sense. Classically Canadian, in spite of geopolitical strategy that could improve the lives of >35 million people. But no please do tell us how all this makes sense and we should stick with how it’s all working.
Constitutions can be amended and deals can be negotiated with FN groups too, this isn’t some impossible task. Difficult? Yes. Needed? Yes.
LNG Canada phase 2 is literally at risk but we have people arguing the dumbest ####.
|
Building these projects in BC is a special example because most of them are on unceded territory. In the rest of Canada there were treaties signed to give the land to Canada, thats not the case in BC. (arguably signed under duress and not delivered on but....)
Consultation does not equal a veto. But in BC it's even messier.