[opendoor]

Originally Posted by MelBridgeman

To substantiate claims that someone is a Nazi, the evidence must demonstrate intent or alignment with core Nazi beliefs (e.g., racial supremacy, authoritarianism, anti-Semitism, or support for the Holocaust). For example:

1. Public statements explicitly endorsing Nazi ideology.
2. Active participation in organizations that promote Nazi beliefs.
3. Advocacy for policies rooted in Nazi principles.

A gesture, association, or poorly chosen comment alone does not inherently prove alignment with Nazi ideology. Context matters, and intent must be clear.

What is a Nazi

1. Belief in racial hierarchy, especially Aryan supremacy.
2. Advocacy for totalitarian governance.
3. Support for ethnic cleansing, anti-Semitism, or Holocaust denial.


I’m not dismissing evidence outright; I’m arguing for the importance of relevant and sufficient evidence

I believe it’s essential to approach such accusations with care and ensure that evidence meets a standard of clarity and relevance. Mislabeling someone as a Nazi without clear intent or alignment risks trivializing the term and undermining its historical significance. I hope this clarifies my position, and I’d be happy to engage further if you have evidence that directly addresses these points.

If I ever get to the point where I spend my free time copy and pasting chatbot responses to troll a message board in support of the richest person in the world, I hope someone puts me out of my misery.