View Single Post
Old 01-20-2025, 02:28 PM   #5560
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
ESPN gives it a C-. I would give it a D

https://www.espn.com/mlb/insider/sto...trade-analysis

He put up a 2.9 War last season , 3.0 the season before , and 2.3 the year before

He is 30 already , can only play DH. And has a career .307 OBP

The second his bat slows down at all he’s the biggest contract anchor in the league

For 1 or 2 year as a DH on a contending team - Sure

For 5 years on the Jays . This will be 3x worse then the Springer deal

No one wanted to pay this guy what he wanted (or at least the term)

Jays overpaid because they struck out on everyone else and managed to get a salary anchor for 5 years

The Jays have spent 19 million on Santandar, 5 million on Straw , 15 million on Gimenez, and 11 million on Hoffman

50!!! Million a year spent on an aging DH who can’t get on base , a guy who won’t make the roster , a middle reliever who failed 2 physicals , and a speedy light hitting defensive 2B

We also give up a 2nd round pick and international signing money for the pleasure of signing Santandar to his retirement contract

How these guys have a job is beyond me at this point
It's funny though that you trash some of the other moves that they also liked.

They love the Hoffman signing and gave it an A.

Gimenez was acquired for a pretty low acquisition cost and averaged over 5 WAR per season the past 3 seasons and they gave Gimenez acquisition a B+.

So sure they gave Santandar a C- ...while also saying he had better hitting numbers than Teoscar the last 3 seasons...and he is two years younger...and $4M cheaper per season...but they gave that signing a B.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 01-20-2025 at 02:38 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote