Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
It's not about agreeing with in decisions/policy. She's clearly shown herself to be unwilling to listen to those smarter and more knowledgeably than her. She proudly boasts of that. Add to that her questionable statements she's made on all manner of things, from vaccines to chem trails, and I'm just at a total loss as to how someone could have faith in her ability to make the right decisions.
Just being motivated by thinking she is doing what is best for Alberta isn't nearly enough. She has to prove she can actually make choices which are good for Alberta, and I've yet to see any evidence of that. From her green energy bans, to the coal policy, to denying us free federal funding, to Turkish tylenot, to not understanding premier powers, to Ivermectin, to the APP, to...well, I just don't get it. Why, beyond "she thinks she is doing right for Alberta" do you offer her such support? What's that based on? Anything more than Blue, and that she yells at Trudeau lots?
|
To me, shes no different than any other political figure. She's going to do/say things i love or hate, and everything in-between. In the end, i think a large portion of their energy goes into what serves them best, sometimes we end up getting in the way and end up benefitting, sometimes we lose. While I'm not suggesting everything else is forgotten and not taken into consideration, somewhat isolating every decision/policy is kind of important (to me anyway).
For me anyway, even the biggest "idiots" who I tend to disagree with the most are still capable of doing good, even if it's rooted in personal political benefit.