https://forum.calgarypuck.com/showpo...3&postcount=12
You can start reading right here for a fun trip down memory lane. Boy was that some high hopes!
Quote:
Based on the article Fitz seems to think 10 OA is worth a haul alone. As in.. markstrom is probably a throw-in rather than a centerpiece in a deal for it.
Personally, I think 28 + markstrom and a minor add is about bang on to move up to 10, and they would probably unload a contract in that transaction too
|
Quote:
It’s definitely not going to be Mercer and #10.
I think it’s more likely 10 and Holtz for Markstrom and #28 as NJD seem to still want a pick in the 1st.
|
Quote:
|
Markstrom and 28 for Holtz and 10 is AOK by me
|
Quote:
Really based on pick values both Markstrom (50%) for 10 or Markstrom (50%) + 41 for 10 should be close to enough value.
It shouldn't take Markstrom + 28 to get 10
|
Quote:
Hopefully they retain to maximize value.
If they can get 10 OA without giving up 28 OA that's even better.
|
Quote:
|
We shouldn’t be adding a thing if we retain 50%.
|
Quote:
They can't have Pospisil...they can have Walker Duehr
Markstrom
Duehr
41
For
10 OV
|
Quote:
|
They can find physicality elsewhere. I really don’t want to move Pospisil.
|
Quote:
Say no to trading Pospisil.
Really surprised some are even considering it
|
Quote:
Relatively controlled young asset showing promise and we want to throw him in for the 10th overall that may or may not pan out.
In the stock market, you let your runners run. Pospisil is just starting to run
|
Quote:
|
If it’s Markstrom plus an asset for the 10th overall, then I wouldn’t add Pospisil but would add the 28th.
|