Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot
My original post was countering PF's delusion of Carney actually winning next election, while aggregate poll number are showing CPC with a 24 point lead and continuing to gain despite the attempted rhetoric and narrative.
You replied to my post by presenting an interesting bit verbatim "that should make Conservatives a bit nervous.", because out of undecided voters that 47% of those would lean Liberal, and 41% would lean CPC. You did so while completely omitting the main poll details.
What exactly are you attempting to debate there? What is interesting about a 6% gap in undecided voters that should make Conservatives a bit nervous? Why don't you explain? 48.9% polled believe Trudeau has the qualities of a good politician? Maybe he should stick around based on that alone since you mentioned it.
I mean...??? what is going in your head there bringing that up?
-snip-
|
I'm not debating anything, I found that part an interesting point for discussion, you thought it was a call to arms, apparently. And where did it say undecided? Did I miss that bit? I ctrl-f'd undecided and there is only one irrelevant mention of the word. And I didn't omit anything. I provided the link, and the point I found interesting to discuss. You aren't very good at this.
My point was(since we are ready to get back to that) that the Liberals have more accessible voters than the CPC. They are obviously not leaning that way right now, but it is the future potential. You know, once the Liberals have a leader so people can then actually start making up their minds? I know, it's a crazy thought when you have to consider this may alter the pol numbers at some point. Wild stuff. So since the last time the Conservatives won an election(a minority, mind you) and Harper got 39.62, well, you might not be able to make out the BLISTERING MAJORITY y'all keep going on about, if you only have 41% accessible. Back in 2018 this number was 46.3%(
https://nanos.co/wp-content/uploads/...18-06-01-R.pdf), so they've actually lost ground on this metric, and I suspect the more Canadians hear PP speak, the less accessible voters will exist for them) Does this make sense?
And I have no idea why you are re-interpreting accessible voters as "leaning" in your post. That's not what they are. They are voters willing to consider voting for a party. A voter could be accessible to many parties, or only one, or none.