Quote:
Originally Posted by FusionX
I mean, he wouldn't be worse than Hanley potentially right? And this isn't a knock on Hanley, I think he's played decent with the main benefit being Weegar on the right side where he's looked better. But, Hanley's 33 and fairly replaceable, maybe by Brannstrom?
Bahl
Bean
Brannstrom
Not great L sided defense, but not terrible?
|
I’d give it 3.6 roentgen.
They don’t need Brannstrom - their offensive guys are Rasmus, Weegar, and Bean in a pinch before they’re calling up kids.
Another Forbet/Bahl/Pachal type would be nice.